Die Einführung des VIVO-Systems an der HTWD befindet sich derzeit in der Testphase. Daher kann es noch zu anwendungsseitigen Fehlern kommen. Sollten Sie solche Fehler bemerken, können Sie diese gerne >>hier<< melden.
Sollten Sie dieses Fenster schließen, können Sie über die Schaltfläche "Feedback" in der Fußleiste weiterhin Meldungen abgeben.
Vielen Dank für Ihre Unterstützung!
Plant protection with silica particles: Electrostatic application and impact of particle layer density on the insecticidal efficacy
Artikel
Natural occurring amorphous silica is ubiquitous on the earth in soils and sediments. Both, natural derived silica and synthetically produced amorphous silica are used against stored product pests and parasites in animal houses. New formulations, active even under higher relative humidity's can be possible used against horticultural arthropod pests. Since many horticultural pests hide on the undersides of leaves and silica is a physical contact insecticide, an appropriate application method is needed. This paper reviews electrostatic application of natural derived amorphous silica to Brassica chinensis leaves. Due to the inherent high volume resistivity of silica powder, induction charging was ineffective for electrostatic powder coating. Corona charging involves a reliable current source, but typically is inefficient in charging the powder particles and creates a high density of free ions between the gun and grounded substrate as well as within the coating layer. These factors resulted in poor coating quality and inefficient particle deposition. The best leave coating was archived using tribo charging. Here we have been able to apply coatings with different thickness. While a silica coating of 25-50 mu m in petri dish experiments resulted in a reduced mortality of the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.), there was no difference between mortality with coatings of 50-100 mu m and 100-125 mu m. Silica applications on B. chinensis leaves resulted within two hours in a 45% reduction of the CO2-absorption. Absorption level stayed reduced over a period of seven days and was between 45 and 73% compared to the control. Even after removing silica dust using pressurized air CO2-absorption was between 19 and 28% reduced. This might be the case because silica particles where so small that they could possible clog the stomata opening resulting in a reduced transpiration and photosynthesis rate.